Wednesday, September 26, 2012

9/26 Jesus as Rabbi/Party temptations

I added the challenege today:

If you want to skip any two quizzes, you can do a "church visit" "missiom" instead.
See  the new "What's on the quiz" tab at top of the blog

Hope you don't have an experience like thsi:


------------------

We watched the video "The Rabbi" today.  It is not online, but here are some excerpts below.
Pay spacial attention to info about the parties, a typical Jewish synagogue, and Jesus as rabbi...especially the prayer shawl.
This will come in handy when we get to


Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan: The Rabbi (with a Blue Parakeet note appended)

The lesson begins at Gamla, a Jewish settlement founded after the return of the Jews from Babylon. The community is on the side of a hill, so steep that one family’s roof is another man’s floor. The opposite side of the hill was a steep cliff.
The residents of Gamla were Zealots, who urgently wanted to overthrow Rome. Jesus prophesied how the revolt would go –
(Luke 19:41-44)  As he approached Jerusalem and saw the city, he wept over it 42 and said, “If you, even you, had only known on this day what would bring you peace–but now it is hidden from your eyes. 43 The days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment against you and encircle you and hem you in on every side. 44 They will dash you to the ground, you and the children within your walls. They will not leave one stone on another, because you did not recognize the time of God’s coming to you.”
In 66 AD the Jewish revolt began. 30,000 Roman soldiers surrounded Gamla. 10,000 Jews crowded into city for protection. When the Romans breached the wall, many of the Jews panicked, and more than 5,000 ran up the hill, only to fall to their deaths down the opposite side of the hill.
The Gamla synagogue
The archaeologists have found the oldest synagogue found so far in Gamla, dating back to the time of Jesus. The synagogue was more of a community center than a church. People came to study, to gather for meetings of different sorts, and to worship.
Jesus taught as a rabbi in synagogues throughout Galilee. 
(Luke 4:14-16)  Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread through the whole countryside. 15 He taught in their synagogues, and everyone praised him. 16 He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. And he stood up to read.
The synagogue had a mikvah, a bath, by which those entering the synagogue received symbolic of cleansing (full immersion was generally required).
The synagogue had a closet for storing theTorah scroll. The person teaching that week would sit in a seat — the Moses seat — and read Torah, the words of Moses.
Any adult male could sit in the seat and read the Torah, followed by a portion of the prophets. The readings followed a prescribed order, to assure that the entire Torah was read over a period of time.
The reader often made comments on the scroll, and so the community got to hear nearly all adult males speak about God’s word over time, rather than hearing only from a professional pastor.
(Luke 4:17-21)  The scroll of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him. Unrolling it, he found the place where it is written: 18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed, 19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” 20 Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him, 21 and he began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
Jesus read Isaiah 61:1-2 and stated that this passage, the passage scheduled for that week, referred to him.
Tassels
Jesus, being a rabbi, wore tassels on a cloth. As Vander Laan explains,
As a Jewish rabbi, Jesus probably wore tassels on the corners of his garment. The Jewish practice of wearing these tassels developed from God’s command in Numbers 15: “You are to make tassels on the corners of your garments so you will remember all the commands of the LORD” (v. 38-39).
Later in Jewish history, the tassels were incorporated into the Jewish prayer shawl, called the tallit, which is worn by many Jews today. On each corner of the prayer shawl are long tassels, or tzitzit, knotted five times to remind Jews of the five books of Moses. The four spaces between these knots represent the letters of God’s name, YHWH. And the knots along the prayer shawl edges use exactly 613 knotted strings, representing the 613 laws of the Torah.
Ezekiel prophesied that the Messiah would come with healing in his “wings.” But the Hebrew word for “wings” could also be used to identify the tassels that Jewish men wore on the corners of their robe. Based on this prophecy, the Jews expected the Messiah to have healing in his tassels.
During his ministry, one woman demonstrated her faith in Jesus by seeking healing in his tassels. Matthew 9 tells us that a sick woman, whose disease had probably left her untouched for twelve years, thought to herself, “If I only touch his cloak, I will be healed” (v. 21).
When she touched the Messiah’s tassels, the woman was healed. And Jesus commended her for her faith.
Faith lesson
Jesus’ method was to love people who were hurting, rather than to use impersonal methods, such as our media. He could have done many different things to get the word out about the good news, and the one method he chose was to do acts of compassion for many of the most unloved people.
For teachers 
What methods have churches normally used to make converts and spread the gospel?
[invite neighbors to church, send missionaries, distribute tracts, TV and newspaper ads, invite the community to events]
What methods did Jesus use?
[preached gospel, acts of compassion, sent out missionaries who were to preach gospel and do acts of compassion
(Mat 4:23)  Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the people.
(Mat 9:35-36)  Jesus went through all the towns and villages, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the good news of the kingdom and healing every disease and sickness. 36 When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd.]
Why do you suppose it is that, historically, the church hasn’t used acts of compassion as a means of evangelism?
[Reformation emphasis on doctrinal correctness, division of church into denominations largely over doctrinal disputes, all led to didactic gospel, that is, a gospel all about getting the doctrines right as a requirement to be saved. Thus, good news was largely about correct doctrine and correct practice: worship and church organization, going all the way back to Calvin.]
Other than Jesus’ example, where else in the scripture do we see passages that associate acts of compassion with evangelism?
[(Mat 5:13-16)  "You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled by men. 14 "You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.
(Eph 2:10)  For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
(Eph 4:11-15)  It was he who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers, 12to prepare God's people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up 13 until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ. 14 Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming. 15 Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ.
(1 Pet 2:12)  Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us.
"Speaking the truth in love" in Eph 4:15 refers to evangelism. "Truth" in the New Testament is normally the truth about Jesus, the gospel. "Speak the truth" is preaching the gospel. It's not publishing bulletins that argue over nuances of doctrine. 
(Col 1:5)  the faith and love that spring from the hope that is stored up for you in heaven and that you have already heard about in the word of truth, the gospel
Paul's point in Ephesians is that God sent Jesus to die for our salvation, so that we'd do good works that would build the church up in unity and bring others to the church.]
How does the world perceive the church?
[Hypocrites, judgmental]
How would this perception change if we lived lives of compassion, as Jesus did?
How would our relationships with other churches/denominations change if we all saw works of compassion as central to God’s mission to which we are called?
[When people get busy helping others, their priorities change. Rather than focusing on every nuance of doctrine, they become concerned with helping people. We become more willing to cooperate when we see the desperate need for cooperation. We are less willing to damn others when we work side by side with them and see the Spirit and God's love alive within them.
Works of compassion make us people of compassion who see the world through more Jesus-like eyes -- and everything changes.]
Additional note
A common theme here is: why did they miss it? Why did the Zealots miss the Messiah and rebel against Rome and God’s plan for Israel? Why do Christians miss God’s desire for us to be salt and light by serving those around us with works of compassion?
I think in both cases the answer is ultimately the same. Both groups find the wrong story in the Bible. The Zealots believed that God’s ultimate goal was an independent Jewish state. Christians often think God’s ultimate goal is to give us a means to escape hell through faith. Neither thought is foreign to scripture, but both thoughts miss the ultimate point. It’s all about the Story as explained in the posts on Hermeneutics and Blue Parakeets.
The ultimate goal is bring all nations into covenant community with God forever — returning to us Eden, where we enjoy oneness with each other and with God. And we can’t be people who enjoy oneness unless we are open to oneness — and that means loving other people just as we love ourselves — and that means doing works of compassion, not because it’s commanded but because that’s just kind of people we are. And we become that kind of people by walking in harmony with the Spirit — that is, in close communion with God living in us.

--------------------

Here's local rabbi Adam J Bernay demonstrating the prayer shawl to a JCC class a couple years ...............................................................................................
part 1:



----------------

part 2:


part3:


..part 4:
The Blessing with prayer shawl
---


We discussed the important Henri Nouwen take on the three temptations.  Be familiar with these, they are on the post from last class.

We also broke into groups by party, and decided what temptations (especially temptations to misunderstand Jesus) each party might fall into.
This will help for your "Who is Jesus to Them" paper ..

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

919 and 21: Baptism/Testations part 1/Signs Mission

UPDATE/CORRRCTION TO THE POST BELOW:

Email i sent you:


Hey class!

Ok, i have to admit I was wrong!!
I mentioned  in class today that the reading from chapters 1-4 was due today, but it is due Wednesday.  Drinette was right.
Notice also the first section of Amish Grace reading  is  due Monday.

As far as class Friday, yes, you will cancel due to inauguration lunch.  So the quiz we had scheduled for Friday,
you can either:

a)email to me by Friday night.
(remember you have choices for the quiz, they are on the bottom of today's blog post here

OR

b)we will save ten minutes at end of class Monday for those who still need to take it.

You might want to do (a) so next week doesn't get too busy (Quiz #3 is next Friday, and I will post the questions for it tonight.  Look for a new tab at the top of our website that says "What's on the quizzes?".
Quiz 3 will be  on readings and class content

I also posted this email on the top of today's post.

See you Wednesday
-dave
--





TEST FRIDAY 21st>>all your best cues and clues about how to study are on the post from Wed. HERE



Check out this awesome blog from our own Vanessa:
LIFE ON CAMPUS: First Impressions


--



Today's class sgtarted with some tests on "texting,"
to remimd us to read texts carefully and in context, and in contexture.




--

Did you hear the news?

The Bible Refers to Jesus' Wife, Too


It's true..but not in the way most people think.

What do you remember from Monday's class about this post?
See  this  and this

Everyone at camp was quite shocked to find out Jesus was married....and who his wife was!
--


--

Then some EPIC (see Monday's post for that word) class-participation via SCRIBLINK:
Then I'll take one of the parties out for a short "historical world" field trip, and have them re-tell it to the rest of the class when we return...to illustrate TTP.



--

Remember the two takes/texts on:
The Christmas story?



How  about this:

MYSTERY TO SOLVE FOR NEXT CLASS:
Which list of the Ten Commandments is the "real" list??

We joked you could win $100 by saying, :Let me read you a list of the Ten Commandments, the only list the Bible explicity calls the Ten Commandments.  Tell if this is the list.  A hundred bucks says I'm right.  Then read them the Ten Commandments from Exodus 34!!:

                      Exodus 20                                                                     Exodus 34: Note: this list, NOT THE 
                                                                                                       OTHER, is the one that says "THESE ARE    
                                                                                                        THE TEN COMMANDMENTS"                                                          


1. I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me.
 
1. Thou shalt worship no idol. (For the Lord is a jealous god).  Smash all idols,
 
2. You shall not make for yourself a graven image. You shall not bow down to them or serve them.
 
2. Thou shalt make thee no molten gods.
 
3. You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain. 3. The feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep in the month when the ear is on the corn.
 
4. Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
 
4. All the first-born are mine.
 
5. Honor your father and your mother.
 
5. Six days shalt thou work, but on the seventh thou shalt rest.
 
6. You shall not kill.
 
6. Thou shalt observe the feast of weeks, even of the first fruits of the wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year's end.
 
7. You shall not commit adultery.
 
7. Thou shalt not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leavened bread.
 
8. You shall not steal.
 
8. The fat of my feast shall not remain all night until the morning.
 
9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
 
9. The first of the first fruits of thy ground thou shalt bring unto the house of the Lord thy God.
 
10. You shall not covet.
 
10. Thou shalt not boil a kid in its mother's milk.
 









..
Here's  Colbert (interviewing a congressman about the Ten Commandments), which
turns out to have several helpful serious points about the "literary world" of   the  topic Here it is:
Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c



--

IN LIGHT OF THAT< we'll read and compare/contrast the two versions of Jesus BAPTISM/TESTATION


Joel Hofman has a great point:


All Bible translators have to confront the problem of words that don't convey the same meaning to a modern audience as they did to an ancient one, said linguist Joel M. Hoffman, author of "And God Said - How Translations Conceal the Bible's Original Meaning."
"For example, `John the Baptist' was really like `John the Dunker,'" Hoffman said.
John was doing something new by submerging people in water to cleanse them of their sins, but that is lost on people 2,000 years later, Hoffman said. Today, people hearing John's title might think it refers to a Baptist denomination rather than his then-strange behavior.  -link
In Michael Bird's paraphrase, he has switched John to the nickname for John, Jack.
Nice move.

I will be combining the two, and tweaking a bit,  and translating as "John the Subversive merger."

I just hope no one mistakes that for "Jack the Ripper"..

or evoke Jack Nicholson's character in "The Shining".. 











-- 


 Jesus' Baptism: we'll watch a short video about the Jordan River called "Wet Feet." It is not complete online, but here is a section of it: 


...and a condensed transcript is here: Jordan River Faith Lesson,  For quiz 4, and for the exam, be prepared to discuss two aspects of the Jordan's symbolism  as discussed in the video/transcript: 1)as a barrier  2)The Spirit descending...and  give a couple answers to "Who is Jesus in Matthew?" from this clip.




By class Monday extra points if you post in the comments below, or bring to class the THREE Scriptures quoted, paraphrased are alluded to  (IT'S A TRIPLE PASTE this time) in the "Text message from God" at Jesus' baptism:

“This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”  

























--
Notes from FPU faculty Greg Camp and Laura Roberts:


All four gospels contain a version of Jesus’ baptism. Matthew records the story of Jesus’ baptism in chapter 3, Mark begins his gospel with the story in 1:1-11, Luke has the story in short form in 3:21-22, and John’s version is in 1:19-34.  How does this text further answer the question “Who is Jesus?” in Matthew?
 Read Matthew 3:1-17Matt transitions to Jesus’ adult ministry by introducing him at his baptism. Mt uses a common ancient literary device called syncresis, which means to make a judgment about something or someone by comparison. It is, in that sense, a simple comparison/contrast. There are 2 comparisons that are being made in chapter 3. One has to do with Jesus and John, the other with Jesus and the Pharisees/ Sadducees. The passage is structured in 3 sections. vv. 1-6 is a description of John and his message. John is presented as a fulfillment of a passage from Isaiah 40, where Israel is being called to return from exile. John is engaged in the same ministry as Isaiah, that of recalling the people. One might conclude that Mt is insinuating that whileIsrael returned from exile in they never fully returned to God. John’s appearance and location set him the liminal space of the wilderness, apart from Jerusalem society. He stands in the Jordan River, whereIsrael also would have crossed into the land as they returned. The place of baptism in the Jordan may draw the reader’s attention to the fresh start crossing the Jordan into the land represented for Israel.
 vv. 7-10 is a description of the Pharisees, Sadducees and others coming to John for baptism. John confronts them with a message of repentance that specifies the repentance must include acts of righteousness that demonstrate their repentance. The reference “God is able from these stones to raise up children of Abraham” may draw the readers attention to the 12 stones piled at the Jordan when Israel entered the land under Joshua’s leadership. The implication is that even stones can be made into children of Abraham. The difference is their acts have to reflect the righteousness characteristic of true repentance and change.
A brood of vipers refers to a hole in ground where snakes would lay eggs and cover them with dirt for incubation. The newly hatched snakes would remain in the ground undetected by those passing by. A misstep into such a nest could be fatal. The threat is unseen; the passerby thinks the ground is safe, but it is not.The reference to cutting down plants that do not bear fruit is a common analogy used throughout Matthew (for example 7:16-20, 13:24-30). vv 11-12 presents John comparing himself to “the one coming.”  The comparison is based on a greater than/ lesser than logic. John is lesser because he baptizes with water; the one coming is greater because he baptizes because he baptizes with the Holy Spirit and with fire. John is lesser because he is not worthy to carry the sandals of the one coming. John announces judgment, the one coming is actually able to bring judgment.
 vv 13-17 draws a comparison between Jesus and the Sadducees/ Phar and between J and John. Note the way that the Sadducees and Pharisees are greeted vs. how Jesus is greeted. (see worksheet) The comparison between Jesus and John involves John putting himself as the lesser in Jesus’ presence. Jesus’ enigmatic response allowing John to baptize him is said to “fulfill all righteousness.” How is this to be understood? Does Jesus need to be baptized in the same way others do? John’s is a baptism of repentance; is this what Jesus thinks he needs to do?
Repentance doesn’t only mean turning from inappropriate action, but also involves going in the direction you ought to be going. Jesus aligns himself with God’s purposes. The dynamics between John and Jesus would seem to indicate that part of God’s purpose is for J not to take the greater position but to place himself in the subservient position to John. This is a crucial, initial assertion that we will see reiterated through Mt’s gospel, which links righteousness to a reversal of power relationships, and Jesus being the faithful, humble servant. Immediately following this action, the divine voice announces affirmation of this action and of Jesus’ identity as beloved son. This is what is expected of the son.
---








==
Check out these fish in the Jordan River, who nibbled at my feet (or somebody did(:...)as a pastor from Africa and I baptized some folks in the Jordan River:




  

NOTE: a drop-down box in the baptism scene:

Jesus replied,
“Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill allrighteousness.
righteous could also be translated "justice."

Watch for this word to drop all over Matthew:,,
what if you read it as  "justice"
instead of                   "righteousness.": 

  


  1. Matthew 3:15
    Jesus replied, “Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill allrighteousness.” Then John consented.
    Matthew 3:14-16 (in Context) Matthew 3 (Whole Chapter)
  2. Matthew 5:6
    Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled.
    Matthew 5:5-7 (in Context) Matthew 5 (Whole Chapter)
  3. Matthew 5:10
    Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
    Matthew 5:9-11 (in Context) Matthew 5 (Whole Chapter)
  4. Matthew 5:20
    For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
    Matthew 5:19-21 (in Context) Matthew 5 (Whole Chapter)
  5. Matthew 6:1
    Giving to the Needy ] “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.
    Matthew 6:1-3 (in Context) Matthew 6 (Whole Chapter)
  6. Matthew 6:33
    But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.
    Matthew 6:32-34 (in Context) Matthew 6 (Whole Chapter)
  7. Matthew 21:32
    For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him.
    Matthew 21:31-33 (in Context) Matthew 21 (Whole Chapter)
NOTE: These verses were copied from Bible Gateway website..see this, and experiment with searching texts on your own., 



(found this online)
It has been hugely productive, revelational and (even) fun to, as part of a class that several others and I teach, have students plot out (on the whiteboard) their timeline.



















As Pastor/Trucker Franks suggests below, sometimes it's "more about the journey than the destination."  See also  "What if Torah/ מלכות השמים, is more 'journey  than 'doctrine'?"
nbsp; 












Especially helpful is the suggestion by Donald Kraybill ("The Upside Down Kingdom") and Ray Van Der Laan (  video)  that throughout  his earthly life, Jesus was revisited by remixes of the original three temptations ("testations" ) of the devil"in chapter 4.

Kraybill provocatively proffers the following taxonomy of the temptations; suggesting that any later temptation Jesus faced (or we face) is at heart in one of these three spheres:



1=  Bread into stones: Economic 

2=Jump from temple and test God:Religious 

 3=Own all kingdoms: Political


Henri Nouwen ("in the Name of Jesus" breaks it down this way:


1=  Bread into stones:  temptation to be relevant

 2=Jump from temple and test God:   temptation to be spectacular  

3=Own all kingdoms: Political  temptation to be rule over

So, it may be useful to plot out various temptations along your life timeline, and ask which of Jesus' temptation are each is  tied to.

Nouwen himself,  one of the most profound writers on the temptations of Jesus, was both Catholic (gasp!) and struggled with homosexual temptation (!!!)..

And....Uh, on that last temptation, the homosexual one, he was in good company, according to a good Book I read:


"Jesus was tempted in every single way humans are..."(click here for the shocking source...but warning, it's a dangerous book for religious folk!) 

SO..if every temptation can be filed under one of the three categories:



Economic    Religious   Political..

or
Relevant    Spectacular   Rule over

..under which does sexual temptation occur?

Note Ron Bell's definition of "sexuality," biblically defined:



"For many, sexuality is simply what happens between two people involving physical pleasure. But that's only a small percentage of what sexuality is. Our sexuality is all the ways we strive to reconnect with our world, with each other, and with God." (Rob Bell, "Sex God," p. 42)...



How might virtually all temptations (the three Jesus faced, or others you could name) be fundamentally economic?  Kraybill, you'll remember, calls the bread temptation "economic," but how might any/all others temptations trace to this root/'garbage"?
HINT: We noted that he term economics comes from the Ancient Greekοἰκονομία (oikonomia, "management of a household, administration") from οἶκος (oikos, "house") + νόμος (nomos, "custom" or "law"), hence "rules of the house(hold)".[1
 


Speaking of tempations. what story from class does this ancient document bring to mind?
What is the "historical world" backstory to this "literary word" text message??: 
------------------

Note  that the baptism of Jesus  (chapter 3) and the temptations (chapter 4) should be read together as one literary unit or paragraph ( a "coupling" or "particularization") as two items connected.

Remember how important repeated words are..in this case,  "SON":



GENERALIZATION/PARTICLUARIZATION





-The segue is direct..."Then after his baptism, Jesus was led by the Spirit  into the desert for temptation by the devil."  (Matt. 4:1)
(see this amazing assortment of Scriptures, maybe he is "God's devil" after all..)


-In light of that, ask In what other ways do the baptism and temptation connect?
How does baptism prepare for temptation?

See the sermon by Nadia Bolz-Weber, "How To Say Defiantly, ‘I am Baptized!’"for a contemporary world application.



NOTE: a drop-down box in the temptation  scene:


The devil's text ,

"IF 
you are the son of God.."

might better be translated
(according to the Greek word used) as:

"SINCE   
you are the son of God.."

What difference might it make?  Is the devil wondering/questioning asking Jesus if he is son of God?  Or is he assuming it; he and Jesus both know that he is...and thus "Since you are the Son of God, what kind of ways can I tempt you to use/abuse that Sonship?"
--
Van Der lann, in "Jesus Our Desert – The Three Temptations") proposes that the three "temptations" Jesus met in Matthew 4 were the same three  that show up  (repackaged, revisited) throughout Jesus' timeline on earth...right up to, and especially including the cross (as in, not avoiding it) .Several examples:


 
  • Jesus put God ahead of family ("Who are my brothers and sisters?"  "Whoveer loves father and mother more than me cannot be my disciple."-Matthew 12:46-48...in fact, how many ways can you find in that whole chapter  where Jesus re-encounters versions of one of the testations?
  • When people reported Herod wanted to kill him, he was not concerned (Luke 13)
  • When people wanted to make him king by force, he walked away  (John 6:15)
  • When the crowds were hungry, the disciples  wanted Jesus to feed them.  He refused (Feeding of the Multitude)
  • The "get behind me, Satan" comment to Peter when Peter suggested Jesus should bypass the cross (Matthew 18)
  • "go ahead and use Your power; the cross is going to hurt" 

The video offered lots of help on how the Testations of Jesus are related to/equated to/hyperlinked to the Testations of Israel in Exodus, Numbers. Deuteronomy.  It is no accident that all three testations of Jesus were found in different form in the OT, as well as the Scriptures Jesus used to counter the testations.

Though it is obvious who "The Son (of God)" is in Matthew (Jesus), unless we know the literary/historical background, we miss that in the Old Testament, that phrase is used for Israel/God's people.   (see  Exodus 4:22-23 and especially the way Matt 2:15 quotes Hosea 11:1)..and sometimes the king (Psalm 2;12).. Thus...remember this chart :







Now we realize that God tested/the devil tempted the first "SON" in a similar way.
Jesus the Son succeeds (in 40 days) in "reversing the curse" that Israel the Son inherited by not passing it (in 40 years).


Jesus is not only (in a sense) the
New Moses,
REMIX/REVISITATION
 but (in a sense) he New Israel
 (for help on that important point, see this  article,
and this).
 




VanDer Laan suggested that the heart of Jesus' "success" was consistently  and persistently keeping the "Shema,"   and not caving into a (mis)use of power.  This is the "binder" of the testations: Love God and neighbor.Thus


Q).Who is Jesus in Matthew?
A.) The One who, unlike Israel, passed the wilderness testations by loving God with all his heart, soul, mind and strength....and refusing to give into using "right-handed"  (a la Capon) power.

 VanderLaan prefers to translate "tests" instead of "temptations."
You have seen that I have coined the word "testations"  It would seen that in Scripture that God tests, and the devil tempts...and sometimes both are going on simultaneously. 


HERE are some helpful questions you might think about if you want to pursue this topic::


  • 1)What were the three temptations of Jesus in Matthew 4:1-11, Compare any ways Mark's account,  Mark 1:12-13  and  Luke's account, Luke 4:1-13 differ, and suggest any reasons why.
  • 2)How does Nouewen summarize the three temptations(1=to be relevant  2=to be spectacular 3=to rule over). H?  How do you (use your own words)?
  • 3)How do the three temptations connect to the historical and literary world of the Hebrew ("Old')Testament?
  • 4)How do the three temptations connect to the contemporary world of Jesus and the disciples?
  • 5)List and discuss several possible ways that versions of the three temptations reoccur and are revisited  throughout Jesus' life in Matthew's gospel?  (How is Jesus tested/tempted elswhere in Matthew, and how are the temptations versions of a similar one (two, or three) that he faced in the original temptation passage?
  • 6)What are the three core temptations you face, and how have they revisited you  throughout your timeline?  How would you categorize them using Nouwen's categories?  Using the three categories of the "Shema"  (heart/mind/might) a la  Vander Laan'?  Using Kraybill's three categories (1=Economic 2=Religious  3=Political; see chapters 1-4 of "Upside Down Kingdom")
  • 7)What have you learned about passing these tests/resiisting these temptations?
  • 8)What does all of this  (the Matt 4 Scripture, and testing/tempting) have to do with the Kingdom?
  • 9)Discuss how the passages that deal with Jesus not being immune to temptation( Hebrews 2:17-18Hebrews 4:14-16,  and Hebrews 5:7-9) affect your views of  "Who is Jesus?" and of Jesus' divinity and humanity.
  • 10)If you were in charge of tempting the US President, what temptation would you choose, and why? 
-----------
Notes from Camp/Roberts:

There are 3 temptations which parallel the groups with whom Jesus interacts in MatthewFamished - provide food – crowdsUpon temple - protection - leadersseize world - authority - disciplesWhat is it that each group expects, and how does Jesus meet that expectation, both here and later?  It is important that these are real temptations.  What would be the result of each if Jesus failed?  Tie in the expectation from Isaiah 53. What kind of Christ was expected? Will Jesus prove worthy (a true Son)? The temptations represent and initial test, much like an academic pre-test. Jesus will be tested during his ministry on these same issues by the three groups.

Famished - provide food – crowds
Upon temple - protection - leaders
           seize world - authority - disciples
 The temptation to satisfy physical needs is a very real and necessary temptation. The temptation account does not denigrate this need, but raises the question of what it means to be fully human. Rulers in the ancient world would often provide bread for people to keep them under control, while not treating them as fully human in other ways. Jesus’ response to Satan is that there is more to being human than meeting physical needs. It also includes being able to make choices about life, where one might need to defer gratification or make choices to the detriment of one’s physical well-being (i.e. selling possessions, death on a cross). Jesus does do miracle which do address real physical needs (food, healing). But he also challenges people in the crowds to go beyond equating physical, material well-being with being fully human.
 The second temptation to leap from the temple has 2 components, The first is to draw attention to himself in the center of Jewish life, thereby gaining the approval of the temple leaders. The second aspect involves having the authority to call upon angels to protect him. The temptation is to use authority as a means to demonstrate one’s power and privilege. In Jesus’ interactions with the Pharisees, Sadducees, scribes, temple authorities, he is most frequently questioned about his authority to represent God, and is repeatedly asked to provide a sign demonstrating that authority. Jesus steadfastly refuses to do so. Jesus will not ‘force’ God to provide a sign of Jesus authority beyond the faithfulness Jesus himself demonstrates. The accusations at Jesus’ trial hinge on this question of authority. The third temptation is to receive power without effort. It would entail bowing down to Satan. There is no equal exchange of goods, with Jesus receiving kingdoms in exchange for bowing to Satan. Rather, in the ancient world bowing down indicates a permanent subservient relationship. Satan is offering the kingdoms of the earth if Jesus will submit to Satan’s will and way of doing things. This temptation is linked to the disciples, who frequently are seeking greatness, seats of authority and power, exalted places in Jesus’ kingdom. They are confronted by Jesus about the true cost of gaining those positions.  -Camp/Roberts



BE THINKING ABOUT what are the unique ways your assigned party would be tempted; particularly re: how to understand/treat Jesus??

 Finally..

Facebook!

I started teaching all this before Facebook announced it was changing it's entire format/interface to "Timeline." As you probably know by now ( If note read all about it here), your Facebook   page and wall (oops, the wall is renamed "timeline") is now regeared to feature and celebrate key points (and photos) of your life.
Ostensibly, the (eventually mandatory) switch wasabout the fun of highlighting historical markers of your life.  As we all (should) know, it's all about Facebook catching even more personal data about us, so they can better target their ads towards us..

...in an attempt to tempt us.

So, whatever theor motive, I also see the switch as a significant (sign-ificant) sign of the times;
there is a hunger in the culture for narrative/story/journey.  Such is integral to the postmodern shift of our EPIC times.

So, plot your life and testations...if not oi Facebook, on paper or in your mind.

Who knows what you'll learn.

Maybe how to me more like Jesus...who faced equivalent temptations to all of us..and passed the test.

..But you know, he never was on Facebook ..

-- 
In any case, the clincher for the argument that the devil's ideas {in the wilderness temptations}aren't all bad comes from Jesus himself. At other times, in other places, and for his own reasons, Jesus does all of the things the devil suggests. Instead of making lunch out of rocks, he feeds the five thousand miraculously--basically the same trick, on a grander scale. Instead of jumping off the temple and not dying, he dies and refuses to stay dead--by any standards, an even better trick. And finally, instead of getting himself bogged down in a two-man presidency with an opposite number he doesn't really understand, he aces out the devil on the cross and ends up risen, ascended at the right hand of the Father as King of Kings and Lord of Lords--which is the best trick of all, taken with the last trump.
No, the difference between Jesus and the devil does not lie in what the devil suggested, but in the methods he proposed--or more precisely, in the philosophy of power on which his methods were based...If you are really God, the devil says, do something. Jesus answers, I am really God, therefore I do nothing...The devil wants power to be used to do good; Jesus insists that power corrupts and defeats the very good it tries to achieve.
..the devil in the wilderness overs Jesus a short cut, Jesus calls it a dead end and turns a deaf ear.-Robert Farrar Capon "The Third Peacock," 43-45.

--

nteresting and subversive to note..also IRONY that it says
 devil.  But what about the "Lord's Prayer" in Matthew 6: "Leas us NOT into temptation."

But God did lead Jesus into temptation..though be clear that the devil did the tempting.

How do you sort this out?

See :The devil is God's devil..


BELOW,: Robert Farrar Capon, from an out of print classic (no wonder it's 100 bucks on Amazon.(
talks about the difference between Jesus and the devil:



In any case, the clincher for the argument that the devil's ideas {in the wilderness temptations}aren't all bad comes from Jesus himself. At other times, in other places, and for his own reasons, Jesus does all of the things the devil suggests. Instead of making lunch out of rocks, he feeds the five thousand miraculously--basically the same trick, on a grander scale. Instead of jumping off the temple and not dying, he dies and refuses to stay dead--by any standards, an even better trick. And finally, instead of getting himself bogged down in a two-man presidency with an opposite number he doesn't really understand, he aces out the devil on the cross and ends up risen, ascended at the right hand of the Father as King of Kings and Lord of Lords--which is the best trick of all, taken with the last trump.

No, the difference between Jesus and the devil does not lie in what the devil suggested, but in the methods he proposed--or more precisely, in the philosophy of power on which his methods were based...If you are really God, the devil says, do something. Jesus answers, I am really God, therefore I do nothing...The devil wants power to be used to do good; Jesus insists that power corrupts and defeats the very good it tries to achieve.

..the devil in the wilderness offers Jesus a short cut, Jesus calls it a dead end and turns a deaf ear.
---

After class, tell me what these clips from "The Matrix" have to do with tonight's topics: Jesus' birth, baptism and wonders:

part 1: white rabbit  (click to view)
part 2:  Neo meets Trinity
part 3:  choose your pill:
part 4: waking from the dream:
part 5: immersion into the Matrix:
:



:




--

SIGNS:

Friday 28, is QUIZ/  2        
Your choice:

1)Questions in red above ..#1-5  
OR
2) Questions in red above ..#6-10  

OR

If you want an alternative "mission," intead of the quiz 
By next Friday, bring to class a report:

1)List several ways the scenes from "The Matrix"  connected to the Jesus story, or the Bible in any way.

OR

2)) Which "sign" of mine from the two "sign" albums assigned to your party is your favorite, and why
2)What funny sign dis you find on campus (hopefully mistake or misspelled).

P: album 1 and 2
S  
album 3 and 4
album 5 and 6 
album 7 and 8

Albums: